Speaking solely to ETimes a couple of minutes in the past, Ayesha stated, “It was an out-of-court settlement. However let me inform you I withdrew the instances 5 years in the past. It has come to mild solely now just because the quashing occurred right this moment. There is a process that was meant to be adopted after the withdrawal of the criticism and that took time.”
Probing additional if there was any cash transaction concerned within the settlement, Ayesha stated that she will be able to neither dwell on that nor on the the explanation why she took the step of withdrawing what she had earlier filed as a result of, “There’s an MOU (Memorandum Of Understanding) signed between the 2 events which forbids from this stuff to be set free.”
Reportedly, Ayesha advised the HC that whereas she had additionally raised a difficulty of non-payment of dues by Khan price over Rs 4 crore in her criticism, she had determined to not pursue the declare or some other allegations made within the two FIRs.
The bench accepted statements of each the events and quashed the 2 FIRs, noting that the case appeared to have arisen out of a ‘enterprise dispute’. It, nevertheless, imposed a price of Rs 1 lakh on Khan and stated the cash will go to the Maharashtra youngster welfare committee for the “welfare of kids beneath the state’s care”.