Zuckerberg rejects claims that Facebook prioritizes profits over user safety

Mark Zuckerberg, chief govt officer and founding father of Fb Inc., speaks throughout a Home Vitality and Commerce Committee listening to in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Wednesday, April 11, 2018.

Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Photographs

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Tuesday lastly addressed the sequence of claims made by whistleblower Frances Haugen, denying that the social media firm prioritizes its income over the security of its customers.

“On the coronary heart of those accusations is this concept that we prioritize revenue over security and well-being,” Zuckerberg mentioned in a post on his Fb profile. “That is simply not true.”

Zuckerberg’s feedback come after practically a month of reports out of the Wall Street Journal which have relied on inside Fb analysis supplied to the publication by Haugen, who left the social media firm in Could. The tales have highlighted quite a few issues on Fb’s providers that the corporate is conscious of however both ignores or doesn’t resolve. This consists of analysis that reveals Fb is conscious that Instagram is detrimental to the psychological well being of youngsters.

“Of the whole lot revealed, I am notably targeted on the questions raised about our work with youngsters,” Zuckerberg mentioned. “I’ve spent lots of time reflecting on the sorts of experiences I need my youngsters and others to have on-line, and it is crucial to me that the whole lot we construct is protected and good for youths.”

Zuckerberg’s publish comes after Haugen spent Tuesday morning on Capitol Hill testifying earlier than senators on either side of the aisles on the issues the social media firm creates for society.

With out referring to Haugen, Zuckerberg mentioned “most of the claims do not make any sense.” Zuckerberg additionally mentioned that “The argument that we intentionally push content material that makes folks offended for revenue is deeply illogical.”

Zuckerberg additionally referred to as on Congress to replace web rules that decide what age teenagers ought to be allowed to make use of web providers, how tech corporations ought to confirm customers’ ages and the way corporations ought to stability giving youngsters privateness whereas giving dad and mom visibility to their kids’s on-line exercise.

“Just like balancing different social points, I do not imagine personal corporations ought to make all the selections on their very own,” he wrote. “That is why now we have advocated for up to date web rules for a number of years now.”

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button